Educerie
Level

This whole subtopic is higher level. Nothing in it is on an SL paper.

Educerie · IB Diploma · History

Paper 3 History of Asia and Oceania · HL3.9 Early modernization and imperial decline in East Asia (1860–1912)

Level
HL only, the whole subtopic. If you are SL, none of this is on your papers.
Themes (key concepts)
change, continuity, causation, consequence, significance, perspectives. The section is a study in contrasting change: why the same western pressure produced a revolution from above in Japan and a string of half-reforms in China, what each response caused in the region, and how historians' perspectives on "success" and "failure" have shifted.
The question this unit answers
why did Japan remake itself into a great power between 1868 and 1912, while Qing China's reforms came too late and too narrowly to save the dynasty?
Where it is examined
Paper 3, HL only: 2 hours 30 minutes, three essays from 36 questions (two on each of the 18 sections of the Asia and Oceania option), 15 marks each, 45 marks, 35% of the HL grade. This section always offers two questions; you may answer one or both.

What you must be able to do

You must be able toLevelWhat it looks like in the exam
Explain the Tongzhi Restoration and Self-Strengthening (1861–1894), and the roles of Prince Gong and CixiHL"Evaluate the success of the Self-Strengthening Movement"
Analyse the impact of defeat in 1894–1895 on China, and Guangxu's Hundred Days' Reform (1898)HL"Discuss the reasons for the failure of the Hundred Days' Reform"
Explain the Boxer Rebellion (1900–1901) and assess the late Qing reforms (1901–1911)HL"To what extent were the late Qing reforms a success?"
Explain Sun Yixian's role, the causes of the 1911 Xinhai Revolution and why it failedHL"Examine the causes of the 1911 Revolution"
Explain the reasons for the Meiji Restoration (1868) and analyse the 1889 ConstitutionHL"To what extent was the Meiji Restoration caused by foreign pressure?"
Analyse social, cultural and economic developments in Meiji JapanHL"Examine the economic developments in Meiji Japan"
Explain Japan's military rise, its wars with China and Russia, and their impact on the regionHL"Discuss the impact of the Russo-Japanese War on East Asia"
Explain Korean isolation, Queen Min, the opening (1876), the Tonghak Rebellion (1894) and annexation (1910)HL"Examine the reasons for Japan's annexation of Korea"
Compare Japan's and China's responses to the WestHL"Compare and contrast the modernization of China and Japan"

Before you start

You need the outline of the Opium Wars and the unequal treaties, because both countries start from them; section 2 gives the minimum. If you study Paper 1 The move to global war, this page is its back story: Korea, southern Manchuria and the Japanese army's independence all begin here.


1The idea in one paragraph

By 1860 China and Japan faced the same problem: western powers with steam warships forced them to open ports, give up control of their tariffs and let foreigners live under their own consuls' law. Japan answered with a revolution from above. In 1868 samurai from the outer domains overthrew the Tokugawa shogunate in the emperor's name, then dismantled their own feudal order, built a conscript army, a cash tax, schools, railways and factories, wrote a constitution in 1889, and by 1910 had beaten China and Russia and taken Taiwan and Korea. Qing China answered with reform from inside an old dynasty. Self-Strengthening bought weapons without changing the institutions around them; defeat by Japan in 1895 exposed it; the Hundred Days' Reform of 1898 was crushed by the Empress Dowager Cixi; the Boxer Rebellion ended with foreign troops in Beijing; and the serious reforms after 1901 raised expectations the dynasty could not meet. The 1911 Revolution ended the empire but failed to build a working republic. Figure 1 sets the two stories side by side.

Figure 1 · Japan and China in parallel, 1853–1912 Figure 1 · Japan and China in parallel, 1853–1912 Japan: from shogunate to great power 1853–54 Perry's warships at Uraga; Treaty of Kanagawa opens two ports 1858 Harris Treaty and the Ansei treaties: open ports, extraterritoriality, fixed low tariffs 1863–64 British bombard Kagoshima; allied fleet bombards Shimonoseki 1866 Satsuma–Chōshū alliance; Chōshū beats the shogun's second expedition 1868 Coup of 3 January restores imperial rule; Boshin War; Charter Oath (April) 1871 Domains abolished, prefectures created; Iwakura Mission leaves 1873 Conscription; land tax in cash; government splits over Korea 1876 Treaty of Ganghwa opens Korea; samurai stipends ended, swords banned 1877 Satsuma Rebellion crushed by the conscript army 1889 Meiji Constitution (11 February); first Diet meets 1890 1894–95 Treaty with Britain ends extraterritoriality from 1899; war with China won 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki: Taiwan; Triple Intervention forces back Liaodong 1902 Anglo-Japanese Alliance 1904–05 War with Russia; Tsushima; Treaty of Portsmouth 1910–12 Korea annexed (1910); tariff autonomy (1911); Emperor Meiji dies (1912) China: reform from within the Qing 1860 Anglo-French troops take Beijing, burn the Summer Palace; Convention of Peking 1861 Zongli Yamen set up; Cixi and Prince Gong seize power for the child Tongzhi 1864 Taiping capital Nanjing retaken by Zeng Guofan's Hunan Army 1865–66 Jiangnan Arsenal (Shanghai) and Fuzhou Navy Yard founded 1872 China Merchants' Steam Navigation Company; first students sent to the USA 1875 Tongzhi dies; Cixi enthrones her nephew Guangxu, aged three 1884–85 War with France: the Fuzhou fleet destroyed; Prince Gong dismissed 1888 Beiyang Fleet formally established under Li Hongzhang 1894–95 Defeat by Japan on land and at sea; Treaty of Shimonoseki 1897–98 Scramble for concessions: Germany, Russia, Britain, France take leases 1898 Hundred Days' Reform (June–September) ended by Cixi's coup 1900–01 Boxer Rebellion; siege of the legations; Boxer Protocol 1905 Examination system abolished; Tongmenghui founded in Tokyo 1908 Constitution promised within nine years; Guangxu and Cixi die; Puyi emperor 1911–12 Wuchang rising (10 Oct 1911); Republic (1 Jan 1912); Puyi abdicates (12 Feb) reform or expansion treaty or turning point war, revolt or defeat Both were forced open by the same treaty system. By 1895 Japan was fighting China; by 1912 one was an empire and the other a weak republic carved into foreign spheres of influence.
Figure 1 · Japan and China in parallel, 1853–1912

2The starting line: the treaty system

Britain's victory in the First Opium War produced the Treaty of Nanjing (1842): Hong Kong ceded, five treaty ports opened, an indemnity paid. Later treaties added extraterritoriality (foreigners tried in their own consular courts), fixed low tariffs, and the most-favoured-nation clause, which passed any privilege given to one power to all. The Second Opium War (1856–1860) ended with British and French troops burning the Summer Palace and the Convention of Peking, while the Taiping Rebellion (1850–1864) cost tens of millions of lives. In 1853 the American Commodore Perry brought warships into Edo Bay; the Treaty of Kanagawa (1854) and the Harris Treaty (1858) gave Japan the same package. Escaping these unequal treaties was Japan's first foreign-policy aim; failing to escape them was China's story.

3Japan: why the Tokugawa fell (1853–1868)

From 1603 the shogun, the hereditary military ruler of the Tokugawa family, governed from Edo; the emperor in Kyoto had prestige and no power. Some 260 domains (han) were run by lords (daimyō) with their own samurai and taxes, and society was frozen in law into four classes: samurai, peasants, artisans, merchants.

Long-term weaknesses. The system assumed a rice economy in a country that now ran on money. Samurai on fixed rice stipends fell into debt to merchants; famine in the 1830s brought peasant risings. Scholars of national learning and the Mito school taught that the emperor, not the shogun, was Japan's true centre. The outer lords, above all Satsuma and Chōshū, had been on the losing side in 1600, were excluded from government, and had reformed their finances and armies.

The foreign trigger. Perry exposed that a regime whose claim was military could not defend the country. The shogunate asked the daimyō for advice, inviting open criticism; in 1858 its chief minister Ii Naosuke signed the Harris Treaty without the emperor's approval and was murdered in 1860. The slogan sonnō jōi, "revere the emperor, expel the barbarians", united radical samurai against the shogun.

Why expulsion became reform. In 1863 the British bombarded Kagoshima, Satsuma's capital; in 1864 an allied fleet destroyed Chōshū's forts at Shimonoseki. Both domains concluded that Japan could not expel the West without western weapons. Early in 1866 Satsuma and Chōshū made a secret alliance, and that summer Chōshū's rifle units of samurai and commoners beat the shogun's punitive expedition. The last shogun, Tokugawa Yoshinobu, handed his powers to the emperor in November 1867, hoping to lead what followed. On 3 January 1868 Satsuma and Chōshū troops seized the palace in Kyoto and proclaimed the restoration of imperial rule under the fifteen-year-old Emperor Mutsuhito (reign name Meiji, "enlightened rule"). The shogun's supporters were beaten in the Boshin War (1868–1869), and Edo became Tokyo.

The historians. E. H. Norman (1940) saw a revolution from above by lower samurai allied with merchants, leaving feudal remnants that fed later militarism. W. G. Beasley stressed nationalism and the foreign threat as what turned discontent into revolution. Albert Craig, studying Chōshū, found its leaders driven by traditional loyalty to domain and emperor, not by class. Thomas C. Smith called it an "aristocratic revolution", because samurai abolished their own privileges.

The foreign threat did not create the Tokugawa's weaknesses; it made them fatal. Weigh the trigger (Perry, the treaties) against the conditions (samurai debt, the outer domains, emperor-centred ideas).

4Japan: rebuilding the state (1868–1878)

A small group of samurai and court nobles ran the new government: Ōkubo Toshimichi and Saigō Takamori of Satsuma, Kido Takayoshi, Itō Hirobumi and Yamagata Aritomo of Chōshū, and Iwakura Tomomi. Their slogan was fukoku kyōhei, "rich country, strong army". Figure 2 shows how each reform answered a specific weakness.

Figure 2 · The Meiji reforms: problem, reform, effect Figure 2 · The Meiji reforms: problem, reform, effect The problem in 1868 What the Meiji leaders did The effect Power split among more than 250 domains, each with its own lord, army and taxes 1869 domain registers returned; 1871 domains abolished, prefectures run by governors from Tokyo One state: a single tax system, a single army, one chain of command A hereditary warrior class, paid rice stipends, eating a large share of revenue 1869–71 four-class order abolished; 1876 stipends turned into bonds and swords banned Budget freed; samurai anger ends in the Satsuma Rebellion, crushed in 1877 No national army; foreign warships could bombard the coast at will 1873 conscription of commoners; German-model army, British-model navy A conscript army that wins in 1877, 1894–95 and 1904–05 Tax paid in rice, varying by harvest and by domain 1873 land tax: 3% of the assessed value of land, paid in cash by the owner Steady revenue to pay for schools, railways, factories and the forces Unequal treaties; almost no modern industry Iwakura Mission (1871–73); state railways, mills, mines; most sold to private firms in the 1880s Textiles, then heavy industry; treaties revised in 1894 and 1911 Demands for a say in government from ex-samurai, landlords and townsmen 1881 promise of an assembly; 1889 Constitution drafted by Itō on German lines An elected Diet with limited powers under a sovereign emperor Each reform answered a weakness the treaties had exposed, and each cost some group its old place.
Figure 2 · The Meiji reforms: problem, reform, effect

The Charter Oath (April 1868). Its five articles, issued in the emperor's name, promised assemblies and decisions by public discussion; all classes united in running the country; freedom for commoners to pursue their callings; an end to the "evil customs" of the past; and knowledge sought throughout the world to strengthen imperial rule. Vague by design, to reassure the daimyō, its last article became the programme of the era, and its first was quoted for twenty years by people demanding an assembly.

Abolishing the domains. In 1869 the lords "returned" their domain registers to the emperor, led by Satsuma, Chōshū, Tosa and Hizen, and stayed on as governors. In August 1871, backed by an imperial guard of about 10,000 men, the government abolished the domains and replaced them with prefectures run from Tokyo; the lords were pensioned off and the state took over their debts.

Abolishing the samurai. In 1869–1871 the four classes were abolished in law: commoners could take surnames and choose their work, and outcaste status was ended on paper, though discrimination went on. Samurai stipends, a heavy charge on the budget, were cut and in 1876 compulsorily turned into government bonds; the same year the wearing of swords was banned.

Conscription and the land tax (1873). Yamagata's conscription law made men liable at twenty for three years' service, with exemptions for heads of households and those who could pay; it gave the samurai's function to peasants. The land tax replaced rice dues with 3% of the assessed value of land, paid in cash by owners who received certificates of title. It gave the state most of its revenue for two decades; protests forced a cut to 2.5% in 1877.

The Iwakura Mission (1871–1873). Half the government toured the United States and Europe, failed to open talks on the treaties, and came home convinced that industry, law and schools must come first. Its leaders therefore blocked Saigō's plan to force Korea open by war (the Korea debate of 1873), and Saigō resigned.

The samurai's last stand. Discontented samurai rose several times, most seriously in Satsuma in 1877 under Saigō himself. The conscript army crushed the Satsuma Rebellion in eight months: peasants with rifles had beaten the warrior class.

5Japan: the 1889 Constitution

Why a constitution? The Freedom and People's Rights Movement, begun in 1874 by Itagaki Taisuke's call for an elected assembly, drew in ex-samurai, landlords and townsmen. In 1881 the government expelled Ōkuma Shigenobu, who wanted a British-style parliament, and issued an imperial promise of an assembly by 1890, which let the oligarchs choose the model and the timing. A constitution was also a condition of treaty revision: the powers would not hand their citizens to Japanese courts without western-style law.

How it was made. Itō studied constitutions in Europe in 1882–1883 and chose the Prussian model of a strong monarch whose ministers stood above parliament; a peerage, a cabinet (1885) and a Privy Council came first. The constitution was presented on 11 February 1889 as the emperor's gift to his people.

What it said. The emperor was "sacred and inviolable", sovereign, supreme commander of the army and navy (Article 11), with power to declare war and make treaties; ministers answered to him, not to the Diet. The Imperial Diet had an appointed and hereditary House of Peers and a House of Representatives elected by men over 25 paying at least 15 yen in direct tax: about 450,000 voters in 1890, roughly 1% of the population. The Diet approved laws and budgets, but if it rejected a budget the previous year's continued (Article 71). Rights existed "within the limits of law", and informal elder statesmen, the genrō, chose prime ministers.

Judging it. It was Asia's first working constitution, and the Diet's power to block new spending forced governments of the 1890s to bargain with the parties; in 1900 Itō himself founded one. But sovereignty lay with the emperor, and the right of supreme command made the army and navy answerable to the throne, not the cabinet. With a 1900 rule that service ministers must be serving officers, the military gained a veto over governments. Historians of the 1930s start here.

6Japan: social, cultural and economic developments

The state starts, private firms take over. With no capital market, the government built the first modern enterprises itself: the Tokyo–Yokohama railway (1872), telegraphs, mines, shipyards and the Tomioka silk mill (1872), with French machinery and experts. Spending ran ahead of revenue. From 1881 the finance minister Matsukata Masayoshi cut spending, founded the Bank of Japan (1882) and sold most state enterprises cheaply to private firms. The buyers, Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo and others, grew into the zaibatsu, family conglomerates close to the state. Textiles led growth: raw silk was the main export, and cotton spinning grew so fast after the Osaka Spinning Company (1883) that by the late 1890s Japan exported yarn. Heavy industry came with state help: the Yawata ironworks, partly paid for by the Chinese indemnity, began production in 1901.

Who paid. The Matsukata deflation drove farmers into debt and tenancy; indebted farmers at Chichibu rose in armed revolt in 1884. The mills were worked largely by young women from poor villages on long shifts.

Society and education. The 1872 education law aimed at schooling for every child, and by the early 1900s over nine in ten were enrolled. The Imperial Rescript on Education (1890), read in every school, taught loyalty to the emperor and Confucian obedience: western methods, Japanese values. Legal equality replaced class, but the Civil Code of 1898 gave the male household head authority over the family, and women were held to the ideal of "good wife, wise mother".

Culture. The 1870s fashion was bunmei kaika, "civilisation and enlightenment": western dress for officials, the solar calendar (1873), newspapers, and Fukuzawa Yukichi's argument that an independent Japan needed independent-minded citizens. The ban on Christianity was lifted in 1873. By the late 1880s imitation provoked a reaction, and Shinto was promoted as a state cult around the emperor. Carol Gluck has shown how the late Meiji state built an ideology of emperor, family and nation through schools and ritual, much of it new though presented as tradition.

Treaty revision. Law codes, a constitution and a modern army gave Japan the case the Iwakura Mission had lacked. The Anglo-Japanese Treaty of Commerce and Navigation (July 1894) ended extraterritoriality from 1899, and tariff autonomy followed in 1911. Japan was the first non-western state to escape the unequal treaties, by making itself look, in law and in power, like the states that imposed them.

7China: the Tongzhi Restoration and Self-Strengthening (1861–1894)

The coup of 1861. The Xianfeng Emperor died in 1861, leaving a five-year-old son, the Tongzhi Emperor. The boy's mother, Cixi, with the senior empress dowager and the emperor's uncle Prince Gong, overthrew the regents he had named. The two empresses ruled "from behind the screen"; Prince Gong, who had negotiated with the British and French in 1860, ran government and foreign affairs.

The Tongzhi Restoration. This meant restoring Confucian order after the Taiping catastrophe: crushing the rebellions (Nanjing was retaken in 1864), reviving farming, cutting taxes in the ruined Yangzi provinces, reopening the examinations. It was led by provincial officials who had raised their own armies: Zeng Guofan, Li Hongzhang and Zuo Zongtang. Prince Gong created the Zongli Yamen (1861), China's first foreign office, and a school for interpreters. Mary Wright (1957) called the Restoration "the last stand of Chinese conservatism": a sincere, able attempt that failed because a modern state's needs ran against Confucian values.

Self-Strengthening. The aim was to learn western technology to defend Chinese civilisation: "Chinese learning as the essence, western learning for practical use". First came arms: the Jiangnan Arsenal (1865) and the Fuzhou Navy Yard (1866). Then enterprises to create the wealth arms needed, under "government supervision, merchant management": the China Merchants' Steam Navigation Company (1872), coal mines, telegraphs, cotton mills. Students sent to the United States in 1872 were recalled in 1881. In 1888 Li's Beiyang Fleet was formally established.

Why it achieved so little. It was provincial: governors with their own armies, arsenals and fleets, and no central plan. It was narrow: weapons changed, but not the examinations, the bureaucracy or the economy. Its firms suffered from official interference, as Albert Feuerwerker showed in his study of Sheng Xuanhuai. It faced conservative opposition to any western learning. And it lacked money: in the late 1880s naval funds were diverted to rebuilding the Summer Palace for Cixi, and the fleet gained no major warships after 1888. Defeat by France (1884–1885), when the Fuzhou squadron was destroyed at anchor, was a warning; Cixi used it to dismiss Prince Gong.

Cixi. When Tongzhi died in 1875 she broke the succession rules to enthrone her three-year-old nephew as the Guangxu Emperor, and ruled as regent until 1889. Her image as a scheming reactionary came largely from her enemies, the reformers of 1898, and from Edmund Backhouse, whose key source, a diary, was later exposed as his forgery. Jung Chang (2013) presented her instead as China's moderniser, which most academic historians think overstated. A defensible line: she backed reforms that strengthened the dynasty and her power, and blocked those that threatened either.

8Korea and the Sino-Japanese War (1876–1895)

Korean isolation. Joseon Korea was a Qing tributary, closed to the West. From 1864 the regent, the Daewongun, father of the boy-king Gojong, persecuted Catholics and drove off French and American expeditions. When Gojong came of age in 1873, power passed to the family of his wife, Queen Min, who favoured cautious opening.

Opening (1876). Japan did to Korea what Perry had done to Japan. After a clash off Ganghwa Island in 1875, it sent warships and imposed the Treaty of Ganghwa (February 1876): Korea was called an "autonomous state" (a phrase meant to deny Chinese overlordship), three ports opened and Japanese residents gained extraterritoriality. China tightened its grip: after a mutiny in 1882 and a failed pro-Japanese coup in 1884, both put down by Chinese troops, Yuan Shikai became China's resident in Seoul. In 1885 Li Hongzhang and Itō agreed that each side would notify the other before sending troops.

The Tonghak Rebellion (1894). Tonghak ("Eastern Learning") was a religious movement set against western learning. In 1894 its followers led a peasant rising against corrupt officials and foreigners. Korea asked China for troops; Japan, citing 1885, sent more, refused to withdraw after the rebels made a truce, seized the royal palace in July and went to war.

The war. Japan won on land at Pyongyang and at sea off the Yalu (September 1894), then took Port Arthur and Weihaiwei. China fought largely with Li Hongzhang's northern forces. The Treaty of Shimonoseki (17 April 1895) made China recognise Korean independence, cede Taiwan, the Pescadores and the Liaodong peninsula, pay 200 million taels and open more ports to foreign factories. Six days later Russia, Germany and France forced Japan to return Liaodong (the Triple Intervention) for another 30 million taels.

Impact on China. Defeat by a country Chinese officials had looked down on was far more shocking than defeat by Britain. It showed that Self-Strengthening had failed, forced the government to borrow abroad, and began the scramble for concessions: in 1897–1898 Germany took Jiaozhou Bay, Russia leased Port Arthur, Britain took Weihaiwei and the New Territories, and France Guangzhouwan, each with a sphere of influence for railways and mines.

Impact on Japan. Japan gained its first colony and a huge indemnity, spent mostly on the army and navy, some on Yawata and the gold standard (1897). The Triple Intervention taught that victory needed allies, and the public watched Russia lease the very peninsula Japan had been made to give back.

Figure 3 follows Korea from Chinese tributary to Japanese colony.

Figure 3 · Korea, from Qing tributary to Japanese colony, 1876–1910 Figure 3 · Korea, from Qing tributary to Japanese colony, 1876–1910 1876 Treaty of Ganghwa: Korea opened, called 'autonomous' Japan's foot in the door 1882–85 Imo mutiny, Gapsin coup: Qing troops restore China's grip China reasserts suzerainty 1894 Tonghak rising: Chinese and Japanese troops land; war war over Korea 1895 Shimonoseki ends China's claim; Queen Min murdered China out 1905 Portsmouth; protectorate treaty: Japan runs foreign affairs Russia out 1907 King Gojong forced to abdicate; Korean army disbanded sovereignty emptied 1910 Annexation: Korea becomes a Japanese colony colony Japanese control rises Two wars removed Korea's two protectors in turn: China in 1895, Russia in 1905. Five years later the kingdom was gone.
Figure 3 · Korea, from Qing tributary to Japanese colony, 1876–1910

9The Hundred Days' Reform (1898)

In 1895 Kang Youwei led more than a thousand examination candidates in a petition against Shimonoseki and for reform. Kang argued that Confucius had himself been a reformer, and held up Peter the Great and Meiji Japan as rulers who had saved their countries from above; his student Liang Qichao spread the ideas in print. The young Guangxu Emperor was persuaded.

The reforms. From 11 June to 21 September 1898 Guangxu issued a flood of decrees: the examinations were to test practical subjects instead of the formal "eight-legged essay"; an Imperial University was founded in Beijing; modern schools, army reform, railways and commerce were promoted; sinecure offices were abolished; officials and commoners could petition the throne directly.

The coup. Almost everyone with power had a reason to resist: officials whose posts were cut, scholars whose years of study were wasted, Manchu nobles, and provincial governors who ignored the decrees. When the reformers were rumoured to be plotting against Cixi's ally Ronglu, and Yuan Shikai, whose troops they hoped would act, did not, Cixi resumed the regency on 21 September and confined Guangxu for life. Six reformers were executed; Kang and Liang escaped to Japan; only the university survived.

Why it failed. Too much, too fast, from too narrow a base: an emperor without real power and advisers without office, against a bureaucracy and a regent who controlled appointments and troops. Luke Kwong has argued that Kang's later writings exaggerated his own role. The failure convinced many young Chinese that reform within the Qing was impossible.

10The Boxer Rebellion (1900–1901) and the late Qing reforms (1901–1911)

Causes. The Boxers ("Righteous and Harmonious Fists") rose in north-western Shandong, hit by Yellow River floods in 1898 and then drought. They believed their martial arts and spirit possession made them bullet-proof, and blamed foreigners, above all missionaries and Chinese Christians protected by the treaties. Their slogan was "Support the Qing, destroy the foreign". Joseph Esherick traced the movement to the social conditions of western Shandong; Paul Cohen has shown how it was later remade as a myth, patriotic or superstitious depending on the teller.

Course. In 1900 the Boxers spread towards Beijing, killing Christians. When allied warships took the Dagu forts in June, the court, where Cixi had been persuaded the Boxers could be used, declared war on the powers. Boxers and imperial troops besieged the foreign legations in Beijing for 55 days. The governors of the south and east, among them Li Hongzhang and Zhang Zhidong, ignored the declaration. An eight-nation force, Japanese and Russian troops the largest contingents, relieved the legations in August; Cixi fled to Xi'an and Beijing was looted. Russia occupied Manchuria.

The Boxer Protocol (September 1901). China agreed to pay 450 million taels over 39 years, to punish officials who had backed the Boxers, to allow foreign troops in the legation quarter and along the railway to the sea, and to destroy the Dagu forts. The powers kept the dynasty because a weak Qing was cheaper than governing China themselves.

The late Qing reforms (the New Policies). From Xi'an in 1901 Cixi called for proposals, and the next decade went far beyond 1898. The examination system was abolished in 1905, ending the link between Confucian learning and office; modern schools opened and thousands of students went to Japan. The New Army, trained on Japanese and German lines, with Yuan Shikai's northern divisions its strongest part, replaced the old forces. After constitutional Japan beat autocratic Russia, the court promised a constitution (1906) and in 1908 published an outline modelled on the Meiji Constitution, with a nine-year timetable. Provincial assemblies met in 1909 and a partly elected National Assembly in 1910. Douglas Reynolds has called these years a revolution in institutions, modelled on Japan.

Why they did not save the dynasty. Each reform created a group that wanted more: nationalist students, New Army officers open to revolution, assemblies demanding a parliament at once. Reform also raised taxes and provoked riots. Cixi and Guangxu died on consecutive days in November 1908, leaving the two-year-old Puyi as emperor under his father, Prince Chun, as regent. Chun dismissed Yuan Shikai and in May 1911 named a cabinet dominated by Manchu princes, telling Han reformers that a constitution would not share power. It fits Tocqueville's observation on France: a bad government is most at risk when it begins to reform.

11Sun Yixian and the 1911 Xinhai Revolution

Sun Yixian (Sun Yat-sen, 1866–1925) stood outside the Confucian elite: schooled in Hawaii, trained as a doctor in Hong Kong. He founded the Revive China Society in 1894, failed in a rising at Guangzhou in 1895, and became famous when the Chinese legation in London held him captive in 1896 and was forced to release him. In Tokyo in 1905 he united several groups in the Tongmenghui (Revolutionary Alliance), pledged to expel the Manchus, found a republic and equalise land rights, ideas he later framed as the Three Principles of the People: nationalism, democracy and the people's livelihood. Its small risings in the south all failed.

Causes. Long-term: defeat after defeat, from the Opium Wars to Shimonoseki and the Boxer Protocol, destroyed the dynasty's claim to rule, and Han nationalism turned on the Manchus as foreigners. Medium-term: the New Policies created the New Army, the students and the assemblies; the deaths of 1908 left a weak regency. Short-term: in May 1911 the government nationalised provincial railway companies, in which local gentry had invested, to build lines with a foreign loan. The Railway Protection Movement in Sichuan became an armed revolt, and troops were moved from Hubei to crush it. On 9 October a bomb went off by accident in a revolutionary workshop in Hankou; police found membership lists, and on 10 October revolutionary soldiers of the New Army in Wuchang rose to save themselves. Within weeks most provinces of central and southern China declared independence, usually led by their assemblies and New Army commanders.

The outcome. Sun was in the United States when Wuchang rose. He returned in December and was elected provisional president by delegates of the rebel provinces; the Republic of China was proclaimed on 1 January 1912. But the Qing had recalled Yuan Shikai, who commanded the strongest army. Yuan arranged Puyi's abdication on 12 February 1912, and Sun stood down so that Yuan could become president.

Why it failed. The revolutionaries were weak: no army, little money, no hold on the provinces, and an alliance united only against the Manchus. Real power lay elsewhere, with generals and provincial elites who wanted order and local control, not social change; Joseph Esherick's study of Hunan and Hubei shows urban reformist elites taking over the revolution there. Yuan wanted power: when the new Guomindang won the elections of 1912–1913, its leader Song Jiaoren was assassinated (March 1913), a "Second Revolution" was crushed and parliament was dissolved; Yuan tried to make himself emperor and died in 1916, leaving China to the warlords. The powers backed Yuan as the man of order, with a £25 million loan in 1913. And the peasants were untouched: in the Chinese Communist reading, a "bourgeois" revolution failed because its leaders compromised with the old elites and never mobilised the countryside.

12Japan the great power: Russia, Korea and the region (1895–1910)

Road to war. After 1895 Russia built a railway across Manchuria, leased Port Arthur (1898), and occupied Manchuria in the Boxer crisis and stayed, threatening Korea. The Anglo-Japanese Alliance (1902), the first equal alliance between a western power and an Asian state, kept other powers from joining Russia. Talks trading Manchuria for Korea failed, and in February 1904 Japan attacked the Russian fleet at Port Arthur.

The Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905). Port Arthur fell after a costly siege, Japan won the land battle of Mukden (March 1905), and Admiral Tōgō Heihachirō destroyed Russia's Baltic Fleet at Tsushima (May 1905). Both sides were exhausted; President Theodore Roosevelt mediated the Treaty of Portsmouth (September 1905). Russia recognised Japan's paramount interest in Korea and handed over its Liaodong lease, the southern branch of its Manchurian railway and southern Sakhalin. There was no indemnity, and Tokyo crowds rioted.

Korea annexed. Queen Min turned to Russia to balance Japan after 1895, and on 8 October 1895 she was murdered in her palace by Japanese agents acting under the Japanese minister, Miura Gorō. With Russia beaten, Japan made Korea a protectorate (1905), with Itō as Resident-General. When Gojong sent envoys to the Hague peace conference in 1907, Japan forced him to abdicate and disbanded the Korean army; guerrilla "righteous armies" fought on. After a Korean nationalist assassinated Itō in 1909, Japan annexed Korea in August 1910.

Impact on the region. An Asian state had beaten a European great power, and nationalists across Asia took heart; the Qing promised a constitution within a year. But Japan joined the imperial powers rather than leading Asia against them: it held Taiwan and Korea, and in southern Manchuria it ran the leased territory and the South Manchuria Railway with its own troops. The United States now watched Japan as a Pacific rival. The balance of East Asia had shifted from China to Japan.

13Why Japan and not China?

Figure 4 sets out the comparison Paper 3 most often invites.

Figure 4 · Two responses to the West compared Figure 4 · Two responses to the West compared Japan Qing China Who reformed A new regime that had overthrown the shogunate The old dynasty, through a few provincial officials The centre Domains abolished (1871); Tokyo controls tax and army Beijing weak; regional armies and arsenals under governors Scope Institutions, law, schools, army, society: 'knowledge from the whole world' Arms, ships and factories: 'Chinese learning as essence, Western learning for use' The elite Samurai officials abolished their own class privileges Scholar-officials whose status rested on the Confucian exams (until 1905) Money Land tax in cash; light foreign debts; a large indemnity received from China in 1895 Taiping devastation; indemnities after 1895 and 1901 Legitimacy The emperor as a symbol that united reformers A Manchu dynasty that revolutionaries called foreign By 1912 A great power with Taiwan and Korea; treaties revised Dynasty gone; spheres of influence; a weak republic The same pressure produced different results because the two states met it with different structures.
Figure 4 · Two responses to the West compared

Structure. In Japan the old regime fell first, and abolishing the domains in 1871 gave Tokyo the tax and the army. In China reformers served the dynasty that needed reforming, power had drained to provincial governors during the Taiping war, and a Manchu court feared both Han officials and change.

Scope and elites. Japan borrowed institutions, law and schooling; China kept reform to the arsenal until 1901. Samurai officials gave up their stipends; Chinese scholar-officials owed their status to the learning that thorough reform would devalue.

Scale and timing. Japan was smaller, more compact and less of a prize, and met the West a decade after China had taken the first blows. China fought the Taipings while foreign troops were in Beijing, and the indemnities of 1895 and 1901 drained money that might have paid for reform.

The historians. John K. Fairbank and Teng Ssu-yü (1954) framed the story as "China's response to the West"; Paul Cohen (1984) criticised that approach for making China passive and urged a search for internal causes of change. The modernisation historians of the 1960s, such as Marius Jansen, presented Meiji Japan as a model of success, against Norman's view that its success was incomplete and dangerous. Both debates warn against a simple success-and-failure essay: Japan's success had costs in rural poverty, repression and an army beyond civilian control, and China's "failure" left arsenals, schools, a New Army and a generation of nationalists for the republic to inherit.

14Where marks are lost

Treating 1868 as the reform itself. The Restoration was a coup; the revolution came in 1869–1877. Say what changed, and when.

Calling the Meiji Constitution democratic, or a sham. It created an elected house with real power over budgets, and it kept sovereignty with the emperor and the army outside civilian control. Name both.

Writing Self-Strengthening as a central programme. It was led by provincial officials, above all Li Hongzhang. That is the heart of why it failed.

Blaming everything on Cixi. She crushed 1898 and backed the Boxers, but she also sanctioned Self-Strengthening and launched the New Policies.

Saying Sun Yixian made the 1911 Revolution. He was abroad. It was triggered by an accident in Wuchang and carried by New Army soldiers and provincial assemblies; his role was ideas, organisation and prestige.

Forgetting Korea. It is a whole guide bullet and both wars were fought over it: Queen Min, 1876, the Tonghak Rebellion and 1910, with dates.

Narrating instead of arguing. The 4–6 band describes a response that is "primarily narrative". Open every paragraph with a sentence that answers the question.

15Write it right

  1. Read the command term. "To what extent" and "Evaluate" want a judgement with a degree; "Discuss" a range of factors or views, weighed; "Examine" the assumptions and links behind an issue; "Compare and contrast" similarities and differences on both countries throughout.
  2. Know what can be named. Questions name only people and events in the guide: Prince Gong, Cixi, Guangxu, Sun Yixian, Queen Min and the events in the table above. Use anyone as evidence (Itō, Li Hongzhang, Yuan Shikai).
  3. Plan for five minutes of your fifty. Write your one-sentence answer first; it ends your introduction and opens your conclusion.
  4. Structure by argument, not by date. Four or five paragraphs, each on one factor or one side. Open with a claim that answers the question; close by weighing it.
  5. Make evidence specific. 3 January 1868, August 1871, a 3% land tax, Article 11, 450,000 voters, 200 million taels, 10 October 1911. One precise fact beats three general ones.
  6. Put the counter-argument inside the essay. The 13–15 band needs other perspectives evaluated and "integrated". Use historians as arguments you weigh (Norman against Craig, Wright against Reynolds), never as name-drops.
  7. Conclude with a degree. "To a large extent, because…", naming the factor that mattered most and why.

16Try it

The first three are short recall practice (Paper 3 itself is essays only); the last three are Paper 3 essays to plan, then write in 50 minutes.

Q1. Explain two reasons why the Tokugawa shogunate collapsed between 1853 and 1868. 4 marks

Q2. Explain two reasons why the Hundred Days' Reform of 1898 failed. 4 marks

Q3. Explain two reasons why the 1911 Revolution failed to create a stable republic. 4 marks

Q4. "The Meiji Restoration of 1868 was caused by the arrival of the western powers." To what extent do you agree with this statement? 15 marks

Q5. Evaluate the success of the Self-Strengthening Movement (1861–1894). 15 marks

Q6. Compare and contrast the impact of the Sino-Japanese War (1894–1895) on China and on Japan. 15 marks

17In one breath

Both countries were forced into unequal treaties. Japan's shogunate collapsed under Perry, the 1858 treaties and "revere the emperor", and Satsuma and Chōshū restored imperial rule on 3 January 1868. The Charter Oath promised to learn from the world; the domains went in 1871; the samurai lost status, stipends and swords; conscription and a cash land tax came in 1873; Saigō's rebellion died in 1877; the 1889 Constitution gave an elected Diet under a sovereign emperor and an independent army. State-built industry passed to the zaibatsu, schools taught western skills and imperial loyalty, and the treaties were revised in 1894 and 1911. China's Self-Strengthening, under Cixi, Prince Gong and Li Hongzhang, was provincial and weapons-only, and defeat over Korea in 1894–1895 exposed it. Cixi crushed the Hundred Days (1898), the Boxers brought foreign troops to Beijing, and the New Policies created the groups that rose at Wuchang on 10 October 1911; Sun Yixian gave way to Yuan Shikai and the republic failed. Japan beat Russia in 1905 and annexed Korea in 1910.


Answers

Q1. First, the foreign threat destroyed the shogunate's authority: Perry (1853) and the Harris Treaty (1858), signed without the emperor's approval, showed that a military regime could not defend Japan, and "revere the emperor" turned that failure against the shogun. Second, Satsuma and Chōshū had motive and means: excluded from power since 1600 and with reformed finances, they modernised their armies after the bombardments of 1863–1864, beat the shogun's expedition in 1866 and seized the palace on 3 January 1868. for each reason, 1 for a valid reason and 1 for specific supporting evidence. Also valid: samurai debt in a money economy; emperor-centred Mito ideas. What scores zero: "Japan wanted to modernise", with no link to the shogun's fall.

Q2. First, the reformers had no power base: Guangxu ruled in name while Cixi controlled appointments and troops, and Kang held no office, so when the plot against Ronglu surfaced Cixi simply resumed the regency on 21 September 1898. Second, the reforms threatened too many interests at once: ending the eight-legged essay and sinecure posts alienated scholars and officials, and provincial governors ignored the decrees. 1 for each reason, 1 for each developed with evidence. Also valid: the speed and number of decrees; Yuan Shikai's failure to act. What scores zero: "Cixi was evil", with no mechanism.

Q3. First, the revolutionaries lacked force: the Tongmenghui had no army, and power passed to Yuan Shikai, who controlled the strongest army; his government was widely blamed for Song Jiaoren's assassination in 1913, and he dissolved parliament. Second, the revolution was socially narrow: New Army officers and provincial gentry wanted order and local power, not a new society, and the peasant majority was untouched, so the republic had no mass base. 1 per reason and 1 per development. Also valid: foreign backing for Yuan (the 1913 loan); provincial fragmentation. What scores zero: events after 1916 with no link to the causes.

Q4. A top-band answer argues: the western powers triggered the Restoration and taught its makers how to win, but they did not cause it alone; they turned a long domestic crisis into a revolution. Plan. Introduction: define the Restoration (the coup of 3 January 1868); state the argument. 1, the case for: Perry, the Kanagawa and Harris treaties, Ii Naosuke's signature and murder; the treaties discredited a regime whose legitimacy was military. 2, the West as teacher: Kagoshima (1863) and Shimonoseki (1864) turned "expel" into "learn"; Chōshū's rifle units beat the shogun in 1866. 3, domestic decay: samurai debt, a rice system in a money economy, famine and unrest in the 1830s. 4, ideas and rivals: the Mito school made the emperor an alternative centre of loyalty; the outer domains' exclusion since 1600; the Satsuma–Chōshū alliance. 5, historians weighed: Beasley's foreign-threat nationalism against Norman's lower samurai and Craig's domain loyalty. Conclusion: to a large extent as the trigger, to a limited extent as the cause; without the domestic weaknesses the shogunate might have survived the treaties as the Qing did. Paper 3 markbands. 13–15 needs sustained focus on "caused by", detailed knowledge of both external and internal factors, historians weighed within the argument and a conclusion with a degree. A narrative from 1853 to 1868 stays in 4–6; describing the reforms after 1868 is irrelevant.

Q5. A top-band answer argues: judged by its own aim, to defend the Qing and preserve Confucian China, Self-Strengthening bought time and laid real foundations, but it failed its own test in 1894–1895 because it was provincial, narrow and underfunded. Plan. Introduction: define the movement and its essence-and-use formula; set criteria (military strength, wealth, the dynasty's survival). 1, successes: the dynasty restored after the Taipings; the Zongli Yamen; the Jiangnan Arsenal, Fuzhou Navy Yard, China Merchants' company, telegraphs, the Beiyang Fleet; Wright's view of an impressive effort. 2, structure: leadership by Zeng, Li and Zuo; regional armies and fleets that did not cooperate; China fought Japan with Li's forces. 3, scope: no change to exams or bureaucracy; students recalled (1881); conservative opposition; Feuerwerker on official management. 4, money and leadership: naval funds to the Summer Palace, no major ships after 1888, Prince Gong dismissed (1884); Cixi's priorities, with caution about her reputation. 5, the verdict of war: France (1884–1885), then Japan and Shimonoseki, set against Meiji institutional reform. Conclusion: limited success: it preserved the dynasty for a generation and built foundations the New Policies used, but could not produce the strength its name promised. Paper 3 markbands. 13–15 needs explicit criteria, balance between achievements and failures, precise evidence and historians' views integrated. A list of arsenals with no judgement is 7–9 at best.

Q6. A top-band answer argues: the war was a turning point for both, in opposite directions: it made Japan an imperial power and pushed China from reform into crisis, yet in both it left a disappointment that drove the next decade. Plan. Structure by theme, both countries in every paragraph. Introduction: the war over Korea and Shimonoseki's terms; the argument. 1, territory and status (contrast): Japan gained Taiwan and a free hand in Korea; China lost its last major tributary and its regional primacy. 2, money (contrast): 230 million taels in all flowed from China to Japan; China borrowed abroad, Japan funded rearmament, Yawata and the gold standard. 3, the powers (similarity): both learned their weakness: Japan through the Triple Intervention, China through the scramble; Japan answered with the 1902 alliance, China with the Hundred Days. 4, domestic politics (contrast within a similarity): nationalism rose in both, behind the state in Japan (prestige that helped other powers follow Britain's 1894 treaty revision), increasingly against it in China (Kang's petition, 1898, the Boxers). 5, the region: Korea as the next arena, Russia's advance and the road to 1904. Conclusion: the impact was greater and more destabilising for China; for Japan it was a first step whose limits set up the war with Russia. Paper 3 markbands. Treating China and then Japan in two separate halves rarely passes 9; the top band needs running comparison, similarities and differences, precise evidence on both, and a judgement.


Educerie · written from the published IB Diploma Programme History guide, first assessment 2017, HL option 3 History of Asia and Oceania, section 9 Early modernization and imperial decline in East Asia (1860–1912). Original text, examples and questions. Diagrams drawn by Educerie. Last reviewed 25 September 2026.

Check your understanding

The main ideas of this note. Tick each one you could do now, in an exam, without looking back up. Anything you cannot tick yet is the part to read again.

Mocks: in the future, hold tight!