Educerie · IB Diploma · History
Paper 1 Focused study 3: Political and economic transitions (from May 2028)
R2 The Russian Federation: how was the transition achieved? (1990–1996)
How did the Soviet Union become the Russian Federation, with a new constitution, a market economy and private owners, between 1990 and 1996, and who achieved it?
SL and HL. Paper 1 is the same paper at both levels, so every section here is examinable for both.
What you must be able to do
- Explain the roles of Gorbachev and Yeltsin in ending the USSR: the struggle for power, Russian sovereignty, the Belovezha Accords and the resignation of December 1991Inquiry question: "How far did Yeltsin achieve the transition?"
- Explain how the Constitution of 1993 shaped the new state: the strong presidency, the Federal Assembly, the referendumContent of the text of the Constitution and a critic's view (6 marks)
- Explain the economic reforms of 1992 to 1996: price liberalisation, tax, vouchers and loans-for-sharesContext of a Gaidar speech or an IMF report (6 marks)
- Explain who gained and who lost: the managers, the oligarchs, the publicContent of a decree and an ordinary Russian's account (6 marks)
- Judge the roles of the leaders and of the system using historians' perspectivesPerspectives across all three sources (12 marks)
At the end of the note you tick off each one you can do: Check your understanding.
In the exam. Paper 1, 1 hour 15 minutes, 24 marks (30% of the SL grade, 20% of HL). Three sources, A, B and C, framed by one inquiry question, and the same three questions every time: explain how the content of Sources A and B can be used to answer the inquiry question (6 marks); analyse how the context of Source C affects its use (6); examine how the perspectives in all three sources can be used (12). Focused study 3 has two examples, the Meiji Restoration and the Russian Federation (1985–1999); you must learn both, and the paper uses one.
1Gorbachev and Yeltsin
Gorbachev's position, 1990–1991. In March 1990 Gorbachev became President of the USSR with wide powers. But three forces were pulling the union apart:
- The republics: Lithuania declared independence on 11 March 1990, and by the end of the year every republic had made some declaration of sovereignty.
- The economy: shortages and strikes (see R1) were blamed on the centre.
- The Party: hard-liners thought he had gone too far, reformers that he had not gone far enough.
He tried to hold the union together by negotiation. In a referendum on 17 March 1991 about 76% of voters in the nine republics that took part (six boycotted) said yes to a "renewed union". With the leaders of nine republics he agreed at Novo-Ogaryovo in April 1991 on a looser union (the "9+1" agreement), and a new Union Treaty was ready to be signed on 20 August 1991.
Yeltsin's rise. Yeltsin had been dismissed in 1987 (see R1) but returned to politics through the new system Gorbachev himself had built:
- In March 1989 he won a seat in the Congress of People's Deputies with about 89% of the vote in Moscow.
- In May 1990 he was elected chairman of the Russian Supreme Soviet, narrowly. On 12 June 1990 the Russian parliament declared Russia's sovereignty, saying that Russian laws came before Soviet ones.
- In July 1990 he left the Communist Party at its 28th Congress, in front of the delegates.
- A "war of laws" followed: Russia and the USSR each claimed the taxes, the oil and the factories on Russian territory.
- In June 1991 he was elected President of Russia by direct popular vote, with about 57% of the vote, the first leader in Russian history chosen in a free election. Gorbachev had never been elected by the people at all.
From then on there was dual power: Gorbachev held the Kremlin, the army and the KGB, while Yeltsin held the legitimacy of a popular vote and the support of Russia's new democrats.
The August coup and its effect. On 19 August 1991, one day before the Union Treaty was to be signed, eight hard-liners announced that Gorbachev was ill and set up an Emergency Committee (R3 gives the details). The coup failed in three days, with Yeltsin resisting at the Russian parliament building, the "White House". Its effects decided the transition:
- Gorbachev returned a weaker man, resigned as General Secretary on 24 August, and the Party was suspended; Yeltsin banned its work in Russia.
- Yeltsin took control of the Soviet ministries, the KGB's leadership changed and the republics, one after another, declared independence.
- The Baltic states' independence was recognised on 6 September. On 1 December Ukraine voted by about 90% for independence; without Ukraine, Yeltsin and the others judged, a union was pointless.
The end of the Soviet Union. On 8 December 1991 Yeltsin and the leaders of Ukraine (Leonid Kravchuk) and Belarus (Stanislav Shushkevich) met in a forest lodge at Belovezha and signed accords declaring that the USSR, which they had founded in 1922, "as a subject of international law and a geopolitical reality, ceases its existence", and creating a Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). On 21 December, at Alma-Ata, eleven republics joined it. On 25 December Gorbachev announced on television that he was resigning as President, because the post no longer existed; the Soviet flag over the Kremlin was lowered that evening and the Russian tricolour raised. The next day the upper chamber of the Soviet parliament formally recorded the dissolution.
Two roles compared.
| Gorbachev | Yeltsin | |
|---|---|---|
| Aim | To renew socialism and keep a reformed union | At first to remove Party privilege; then to make Russia independent and rebuild it on market lines |
| Method | Reform from above, through the Party and then through new institutions; negotiation; unwilling to use force on a large scale | Populist politics, direct appeal to voters, confrontation with the centre, use of Russian sovereignty |
| Source of power | The Party and then the Soviet presidency, not elected by the people | An elected Russian presidency, with voters and the democrats behind him |
| Result | Opened the door to a free society and the end of the Cold War, but lost the union | Won power and the union's property, but inherited the state's collapse |
Gorbachev began the transition and Yeltsin completed it, but not in the way either planned. Gorbachev did not mean to end the USSR; Yeltsin, who in 1990 was demanding Russian sovereignty inside it, did not plan the Belovezha Accords in advance.
2The Constitution of 1993
The problem. After 1991 Russia had no constitution of its own: it was run under the old Soviet-era Russian constitution with many changes. It left the lines of authority unclear. Yeltsin as president had been given special decree powers for a year to carry out reform, but the Congress of People's Deputies and the Supreme Soviet, elected in 1990 when the Party still dominated, claimed the supreme authority. They were led by their chairman Ruslan Khasbulatov, and Vice-President Aleksandr Rutskoi became a critic of Yeltsin's economic policy. In December 1992 the Congress refused to confirm Yegor Gaidar as prime minister; Yeltsin compromised on Viktor Chernomyrdin. In April 1993 a referendum asked four questions: about 59% said they had confidence in Yeltsin and 53% supported his economic policy. That strengthened the president but did not end the struggle, which in the autumn broke into violence (R3). After it, Yeltsin put his own constitution to the voters.
The vote. On 12 December 1993 voters took part in a referendum on the draft constitution, and at the same time elected the first State Duma. Official figures were about 58% in favour, with a turnout of about 55%, just above the 50% needed for the draft to pass; some Russian analysts later argued that the turnout was inflated. In the Duma election the nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky's Liberal Democratic Party won about 23% of the party-list vote, the pro-reform Russia's Choice about 15% and the Communists about 12%. For Yeltsin's supporters it was a poor result: the voters had approved the constitution but not his party. The constitution came into force on 25 December 1993.
What it says.
- State and rights. Russia is a "democratic federal law-governed state with a republican form of government" (Article 1). Chapter 2 sets out a wide range of rights and freedoms, modelled on the international ones; Article 13 forbids any state ideology and allows several parties, so no party can claim the Communist Party's old monopoly.
- The president. The president is head of state, "guarantor" of the Constitution, commander-in-chief and the main maker of foreign policy. He is elected by the people for four years, with a limit of two consecutive terms. He appoints the prime minister with the Duma's consent, chooses the other ministers and can issue decrees that have the force of law if they do not conflict with the constitution or laws.
- Over the parliament. If the Duma rejects his candidate for prime minister three times, the president dissolves it and calls elections. If it votes no confidence in the government twice within three months, he can dismiss the government or dissolve the Duma. He can propose laws and veto bills (a veto needs a two-thirds vote of both houses to override).
- Impeachment is so hard that it is almost impossible: charges by the Duma by a two-thirds majority, then rulings by the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, then a two-thirds vote of the Federation Council.
- The parliament. The Federal Assembly has two houses: the Federation Council (two members from each of the 89 regions and republics of the federation) and the State Duma (450 deputies, half elected from party lists and half from single-member districts).
- Courts and federalism. A Constitutional Court was set up; the federation's 89 "subjects" (republics, regions, cities) have their own governments, though the relationship was still being worked out; the Federation Treaty of March 1992 had been signed by all except Tatarstan and Chechnya (see R3).
Perspectives. Supporters argued that after the paralysis of 1992–93 a strong president was needed to carry out reform and hold together a huge, unstable state; Yeltsin's advisers pointed to France's Fifth Republic as a model. Critics, including many Russian liberals and Western political scientists, called it "super-presidential": the president had few checks, the Duma had little power over the government and impeachment was a dead letter. They also said the constitution was passed on a disputed turnout, after tanks had shelled parliament, by a president who had unilaterally set aside the old one. Continuity and change: the constitution broke with the Soviet system by guaranteeing rights, a multiparty system and a separation of powers, but kept a tradition of a single, powerful centre of authority.
3Privatisation, market liberalisation and tax reforms
The decision. On 28 October 1991 Yeltsin told the Russian Congress that Russia would move to a market economy at once. In November he put the young economist Yegor Gaidar in charge of economic policy (as deputy prime minister, and acting prime minister from June to December 1992), with Anatoly Chubais responsible for privatisation. Their view was that gradual reform had failed under Gorbachev; a window of political opportunity was open, and delay would lose it. They were supported by Western advisers such as Jeffrey Sachs and, from 1992, by the IMF, which Russia joined in June 1992.
Liberalisation. On 2 January 1992 most prices were freed. Trade was opened and the rouble's exchange rate was made market-based in the course of 1992. Subsidies and military orders were cut. A new tax system came in with a value-added tax (VAT) of 28% (cut to 20% in 1993), profit tax and income tax. The immediate effect was the opposite of what the planners hoped for in one respect: instead of a short jump, prices rose about twenty-six times in 1992 (inflation of about 2,500%), wiping out savings. The shops, though, filled with goods.
Privatisation.
- Small privatisation (shops, restaurants, services) began in 1992 and was quick and popular.
- Voucher privatisation: from October 1992 every citizen received a voucher with a face value of 10,000 roubles, some 144 million in all, which could be exchanged for shares in a firm or sold. By law managers and workers could get a controlling share in most firms; by 1994 most of Russia's large and medium-sized industry, some 15,000 firms, had been privatised. Many people sold their vouchers for little, to be bought up by managers and speculators.
- Loans for shares (1995): to fill the budget the government borrowed money from a few big banks and gave them shares in the best state companies as collateral, with the right to sell them if the loan was not repaid. The auctions were rigged to favour the lenders: Norilsk Nickel went for about $170 million and Yukos (a 45% stake) for about $159 million, far below what they were worth. The banks' owners became the oligarchs.
- In the 1996 election the oligarchs and their television channels backed Yeltsin against the Communist candidate Gennady Zyuganov. Yeltsin won in the second round on 3 July 1996 with about 54% to 40%.
Tax and the budget. The government could not collect the taxes it set. Companies paid late, in goods (barter) or hid income; the state's revenue was low, so it borrowed on a large scale at high interest, including through short-term bonds, and cut public spending, which led to wage and pension arrears. In March 1996 the IMF granted a loan of about $10 billion. The first part of a Tax Code was passed only in 1998 and came into force in 1999; the rates were fixed in a second part in 2000.
The outcome by 1996. On European Bank estimates, by the mid-1990s more than half of Russia's output came from the private sector. Russia had a market in goods and a stock market, but not strong courts or competition; many firms were owned by their managers or by a few financial groups. The transition had been achieved in the sense that the plan was gone and property was private. R3 deals with its costs.
4How far was it achieved, and by whom? The historians
| View | Argument |
|---|---|
| A struggle of personalities | The end of the USSR was the result of the rivalry between Gorbachev and Yeltsin, in which Yeltsin used Russian sovereignty to destroy the union (a view common in the early 1990s; the standard biographies are Timothy Colton, Yeltsin: A Life, 2008, and William Taubman, Gorbachev: His Life and Times, 2017) |
| Nationalism and the republics (Serhii Plokhy, The Last Empire, 2014) | The decisive blow was Ukraine's vote of 1 December 1991 and the leaders' wish to rule their own states; Yeltsin's role was to accept it |
| The speed was necessary (Anders Åslund, Yegor Gaidar) | Without shock therapy in 1992 Russia would have faced collapse and famine; privatisation had to be fast to make the change irreversible before communists could stop it |
| The speed was the mistake (Joseph Stiglitz; Marshall Goldman, The Piratization of Russia, 2003) | Freeing prices and selling firms before there were institutions such as courts, competition and a tax system produced inflation, theft and the oligarchs; gradual reform on the Chinese model would have been better |
| The constitution | A strong president suited a transition, say defenders; critics say "super-presidentialism" put too much in one man's hands and led to the personal rule of later years |
The balanced answer is that Gorbachev made the transition possible, Yeltsin made it happen and gave it its form, and the combination of speed, the shape of the state and the rivalry of the leaders explains why it was achieved the way it was.
5Where marks are lost
Saying Gorbachev ended the USSR on purpose. He tried to save it with a new Union Treaty; he resigned only when nothing was left to lead.
Saying Yeltsin planned the Belovezha Accords from the start. In 1990 he asked for Russian sovereignty inside the union. The decision came after the coup and Ukraine's referendum.
Mixing up "shock therapy" and "privatisation". Liberalisation (freeing prices) came first in January 1992; vouchers began in October 1992; loans-for-shares was 1995. Keep them apart.
Calling the 1993 constitution simply "democratic" or "dictatorial". It guaranteed rights and elections while giving the president very large powers. Give both sides.
Forgetting the Duma election. The voters approved the constitution on the same day as they gave a large vote to Zhirinovsky and the Communists: that is evidence about how far the public supported the reforms.
Ignoring the other republics. The Belovezha Accords were signed by Russia, Ukraine and Belarus; the Baltic states had already left and the Central Asian leaders joined at Alma-Ata.
6Write it right
- Name the actor and the date: Gorbachev (President of the USSR), Yeltsin (President of Russia from June 1991), Gaidar, Chubais, Khasbulatov, Kravchuk.
- First question (content of A and B): take specific claims from each source and use them to answer the inquiry question; explain what each one shows, not just what it says.
- Second question (context of C): a decree is the state's own text; an IMF report is written by creditors who want the reform to continue; a Gaidar speech defends his own programme; a memoir written years later is shaped by its author's reputation. Say how each affects use.
- Third question (perspectives): compare insider and outsider, supporter and critic, and a source from the time with later hindsight. Explain agreement and disagreement and judge which is more valuable for the inquiry question.
- Precise own knowledge: 12 June 1990, 12 June 1991, 8 December 1991, 25 December 1991, 2 January 1992, 12 December 1993, 3 July 1996.
7In one breath
Gorbachev became President of the USSR in 1990 but lost ground to Yeltsin, who won the chairmanship of the Russian parliament (May 1990), a declaration of Russian sovereignty (12 June 1990) and, on 12 June 1991, a popular election as president; after the August 1991 coup failed, Yeltsin took over the ministries, Ukraine voted for independence on 1 December, and on 8 December the Belovezha Accords created the CIS and on 25 December Gorbachev resigned. Yeltsin began shock therapy on 2 January 1992 (prices freed, VAT, trade opened, inflation about 2,500%), privatised by vouchers from October 1992 and through loans-for-shares in 1995, creating the oligarchs, and in December 1993 the Constitution, voted for by about 58% on a disputed turnout, gave the president power to appoint the prime minister, rule by decree and dissolve the Duma, with an almost impossible impeachment. Yeltsin's re-election in July 1996 closed the transition. Historians debate whether it was the rivalry of two men, nationalism, the speed of reform or the strong presidency that shaped it.
Check your understanding
Tick each one you could do in an exam without looking back. Read again whatever you cannot tick.
8Try it
Q1 and Q2 test recall; Q3 and Q4 practise the second and third Paper 1 questions on described sources. For whole papers on this note, with real sources and all three questions marked by band, use the 3 Russian Federation source sets in Practicerie.
Q1. Explain two reasons why Yeltsin's position was stronger than Gorbachev's by the autumn of 1991. 4 marks
Q2. Explain two ways in which the Constitution of 1993 strengthened the powers of the president. 4 marks
Q3. Source C is an address by Yeltsin to the Russian Congress of People's Deputies on 28 October 1991, announcing radical market reform. Analyse how the context of this source affects how a historian could use it to answer the inquiry question: "How was the move to a market economy achieved?" 6 marks
Q4. Source A is the Belovezha Accords of 8 December 1991; Source B is Gorbachev's resignation speech of 25 December 1991. Examine how the perspectives in these two sources could be used to answer the inquiry question: "How was the end of the Soviet Union achieved?" 6 marks
Answers
Q1. First, legitimacy: Yeltsin had been elected President of Russia by the voters in June 1991 with about 57%, while Gorbachev had been chosen by a Congress and never faced the voters; Yeltsin could claim to speak for the people. Second, the August coup: Yeltsin's stand at the White House showed leadership and Gorbachev returned weakened, resigned as General Secretary and watched Yeltsin take over the ministries and ban the Party in Russia. 1 for each reason and 1 for each developed with specific evidence. Also valid: Russia's resources and its position as the largest republic; Ukraine's referendum on 1 December; Gorbachev's loss of the Party's support. What scores zero: reasons that apply only to 1985–89.
Q2. First, appointing the government: the president names the prime minister, subject to the Duma's consent, but if the Duma rejects his candidate three times he dissolves it and calls new elections, so the Duma cannot in the end block him. Second, decree power and impeachment: his decrees have the force of law unless they conflict with the constitution, and impeachment needs a two-thirds vote by the Duma, rulings by two courts and a two-thirds vote by the Federation Council, so he is hardly removable. 1 per way and 1 per development. Also valid: command of the armed forces; power to dissolve the Duma after two no-confidence votes; right to call referendums. What scores zero: rights and freedoms in Chapter 2.
Q3. A strong answer analyses: Origin and date. A speech by the elected President of Russia to the Russian parliament on 28 October 1991, two months after the coup failed and before the end of the USSR, when Yeltsin was the most powerful man in Russia. Purpose and audience. To win the support of a parliament that was suspicious of him for radical reform, and to inform the public that prices would be freed; so it states intentions and promises, probably more optimistic than reality, and uses persuasive language. Limitations from context. It cannot show what happened: the 1992 inflation, privatisation and loss of savings came afterwards; and it does not show the objections of the deputies, the managers or the public. So: valuable evidence for the leaders' aims, timing and justification; weaker for how reform was achieved or how it worked, which needs later records. band marking. 5–6 needs several aspects of context (author, date, purpose, audience) each linked to how the source can be used for the inquiry question. Describing the programme alone is 1–2.
Q4. A strong answer examines: Source A is the perspective of Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich, the leaders of the three Slavic republics, claiming a legal right to dissolve the union they had founded in 1922 and replacing it with the CIS; it shows that the end of the USSR was decided by republic leaders, not by Gorbachev or the Soviet parliament. Its limitation: it was signed in secret by three men without the others' consent, and it is a legal formula, not an account of motives. Source B is the perspective of the departing President, regretting that the union state had been broken up while taking credit for freedom and democracy; it shows a leader who lost the power he wanted to keep, and who accepted the outcome without force. The sources conflict about legitimacy: the republic leaders claim a right to end the union, the Soviet president had no way left to stop it. They agree that the union could not be kept in the form it had. Own knowledge (the sovereignty declaration of 12 June 1990, Ukraine's vote on 1 December, the coup of August 1991) explains how Yeltsin's route and Gorbachev's loss of power came together. band marking. Top band identifies each perspective and its basis, explains agreement and conflict, and links both to the inquiry question with own knowledge. Describing the Accords and the speech separately stays in the lowest band.
Educerie · written from the published IB Diploma Programme History guide, first assessment 2028, focused study 3 Political and economic transitions, the Russian Federation (1985–1999): how was the transition achieved? Original text, examples and questions. Diagrams drawn by Educerie. Last reviewed 6 October 2026.