Educerie
Level

1 higher-level section hidden.

Educerie · IB Diploma · Economics

Unit 4 The global economy · 4.5 Exchange rates

Level
SL and HL. Section 9 is HL only. If you are SL, learn sections 1 to 8 and stop; nothing in section 9 is on your papers.
Themes (key concepts)
interdependence, change, intervention. An exchange rate is one price that two countries share, so it is interdependence you can draw; and it is the one price a government can decide to hold still.
The question this unit answers
what decides how much of one currency you have to give up to get another, and what happens to an economy when that number moves?
Where it is examined
Paper 1 part (a), "explain, using a diagram", on determination or on a cause; Paper 1 part (b), where you evaluate what a change in the rate does; Paper 2, where a data extract gives you rates to convert and a percentage change to calculate; HL Paper 3, where the same market sits underneath a policy question.

What you must be able to do

You must be able toLevelWhat it looks like in the exam
Explain how a floating exchange rate is determined, and draw the market for a currencySL, HL"Explain, using a diagram, how the exchange rate of a currency is determined" (10 marks)
Explain and draw an appreciation and a depreciation, from a shift in demand and from a shift in supplySL, HLPaper 1 part (a). The diagram alone carries several marks
Calculate the price of a good in another currency, in both directionsSL, HLPaper 2 calculation, 2 marks, and HL Paper 3
Calculate the change in the value of a currency from a set of dataSL, HLPaper 2 calculation, 2 marks, usually a percentage
Explain the ten causes of a change in demand for or supply of a currencySL, HL"Explain two factors that could cause the currency described to depreciate"
Evaluate the consequences of a change in the rate for inflation, growth, unemployment, the current account and living standards, using AD/ASSL, HLPaper 1 part (b), 15 marks. The evaluation marks live here
Explain devaluation and revaluation, and draw how a fixed rate is maintainedSL, HLPaper 1 part (a), "explain, using a diagram"
Explain a managed exchange rate, and what an overvalued or undervalued currency isSL, HLPaper 2, where an extract describes a government holding a rate
Evaluate fixed against floating exchange rate systemsHL onlyPaper 1 part (b), 15 marks; HL Paper 3

Before you start

You need supply and demand from 2.1 and 2.2, because this whole subtopic is one market drawn with unfamiliar axes. You need AD/AS from 3.2 and 3.3, because section 6 draws the consequences on that diagram. You will meet the balance of payments again in 4.6 Balance of payments, which uses this market to explain how a current account deficit and a financial account inflow push a currency about; read that unit after this one, not before.


1The idea in one paragraph

An exchange rate is the price of one currency in terms of another. It is a price like any other, so it is set where the demand for a currency meets the supply of it, and it moves when either side moves. That single sentence is the whole subtopic. Everything after it is a list: who is on each side of the market, the ten things that move them, what the movement does to prices and jobs, and what happens instead when a government decides the rate rather than letting the market decide it.

2The exchange rate is a price, and the axes say whose

The country in these notes is Solvara and its currency is the Solvaran dollar, written $. Its trading partners use the euro. The exchange rate we draw is the price of one Solvaran dollar in euros, which today is €0.80 per $1.

Now the part that decides your diagram mark before you have drawn a single curve.

The exchange rate is a price. Put the price of one currency on the vertical axis, the quantity of that same currency on the horizontal axis, and every question in 4.5 turns into supply and demand.

The vertical axis is not "price". It is the price of one Solvaran dollar measured in euros, and the label must say so: € per $. The horizontal axis is not "quantity". It is the quantity of Solvaran dollars bought and sold in a period, and the label must say that too. Figure 1 is the labelling, item by item. Copy it.

Figure 1 · The market for a currency, labelled the way a marker wants it Figure 1 · The market for a currency, labelled the way a marker wants it Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded D$ S$ e* Q* foreigners buying dollars Solvarans selling dollars 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 The vertical axis is a price: what one dollar costs in euros. Never just "price". 2 The horizontal axis is a quantity of dollars, not a quantity of goods. 3 The demand curve labelled D$, because it is demand for the currency itself. 4 The supply curve labelled S$: dollars offered by whoever wants euros instead. 5 The equilibrium rate e* on the price axis, with a dotted line across to it. 6 The equilibrium quantity Q* below it, with a dotted line down to the axis. The axes are the marks students throw away. Copy this labelling into every 4.5 diagram.
Figure 1 · The market for a currency, labelled the way a marker wants it

Mislabelling these two axes is the single most common error in 4.5, and it is expensive: a diagram whose axes describe the wrong thing cannot earn the diagram marks even when the explanation beside it is right.

Who is on each side? Ask one question about any transaction: does somebody need to obtain dollars, or does somebody need to give dollars up?

Demand for the Solvaran dollar comes from anybody who has to pay Solvara. A German firm buying Solvaran timber has euros and needs dollars, so it buys dollars. Demand slopes down for the ordinary reason: when a dollar is cheap in euros, Solvaran goods and assets look cheap to foreigners, so more dollars are wanted.

Supply of the Solvaran dollar comes from anybody who has to pay abroad. A Solvaran family booking a holiday in France has dollars and needs euros, so it offers dollars for sale. Supply slopes up: when a dollar buys a lot of euros, foreign goods and assets look cheap to Solvarans, so more dollars are offered.

Figure 2 · Who buys dollars, and who sells them Figure 2 · Who buys dollars, and who sells them A transaction between Solvara and abroad payment comes in payment goes out Demand for dollars (D$) foreigners buying Solvaran exports foreign firms investing directly here foreigners buying Solvaran shares and bonds Solvarans abroad sending remittances home speculators who expect the dollar to rise the central bank buying its own currency Supply of dollars (S$) Solvarans buying imports Solvaran firms investing directly abroad Solvarans buying foreign shares and bonds foreign workers here sending money home speculators who expect the dollar to fall the central bank selling its own currency Every one of the ten factors in the syllabus sits in one of these two columns. Anyone who has to pay Solvara demands dollars. Anyone who has to pay abroad supplies them.
Figure 2 · Who buys dollars, and who sells them

Where the two meet is the equilibrium exchange rate, e\, and the quantity traded is Q\. A floating exchange rate is one left to settle there, with no government or central bank holding it anywhere.

3Appreciation and depreciation

Two words, and they belong to a floating rate only.

  • An appreciation is a rise in the value of a currency against another, brought about by the market. More euros per dollar.
  • A depreciation is a fall in the value of a currency against another, brought about by the market. Fewer euros per dollar.

Each can happen in two ways, because there are two curves. Figure 3 moves demand and Figure 4 moves supply.

Figure 3 · Demand for the currency shifts Figure 3 · Demand for the currency shifts Demand rises: appreciation Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded S$ D$₁ D$₂ e₁ Q₁ A e₂ Q₂ B Demand falls: depreciation Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded S$ D$₁ D$₂ e₁ Q₁ A e₂ Q₂ B Left: more people want dollars, so the dollar appreciates. Right: fewer people want them, so it depreciates. The supply curve never moved.
Figure 3 · Demand for the currency shifts

In the left panel of Figure 3, something makes foreigners want more dollars. Demand shifts right from D$₁ to D$₂, the market clears at the higher rate e₂, and more dollars change hands. The dollar has appreciated. In the right panel demand falls, the rate settles at the lower e₂, and the dollar has depreciated. The supply curve did not move in either panel, and drawing it moving would contradict your own explanation.

Figure 4 · Supply of the currency shifts Figure 4 · Supply of the currency shifts Supply rises: depreciation Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded D$ S$₁ S$₂ e₁ Q₁ A e₂ Q₂ B Supply falls: appreciation Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded D$ S$₁ S$₂ e₁ Q₁ A e₂ Q₂ B Left: more dollars are offered for sale, so the dollar depreciates. Right: fewer are offered, so it appreciates. This time the demand curve never moved.
Figure 4 · Supply of the currency shifts

Figure 4 does the same job from the other side. More dollars offered for sale, in the left panel, pushes the rate down: a depreciation. Fewer dollars offered pushes it up: an appreciation. So an appreciation can come from a rise in demand or a fall in supply, and a depreciation from a rise in supply or a fall in demand. A question that says "the dollar appreciated" has not told you which curve moved. Read the cause and decide.

One more habit worth building now. Because an exchange rate is always the price of one currency in terms of another, every sentence has two halves. If the Solvaran dollar appreciates against the euro, the euro has depreciated against the Solvaran dollar. Say which currency you mean, every time.

4The ten things that move the curves

The guide names ten. Each one works the same way: decide whether it makes somebody need dollars or need to give dollars up, move that curve, and read off the new rate. Figure 5 has all ten with the reasoning.

Figure 5 · The ten causes the guide names, sorted Figure 5 · The ten causes the guide names, sorted What changes Which curve moves, and why The Solvaran dollar Foreign demand for exports rises Buyers abroad must obtain dollars to pay Solvaran firms, so D$ shifts right. appreciates Domestic demand for imports rises Solvarans must give up dollars to obtain euros, so S$ shifts right. depreciates Inward or outward foreign direct investment Inward FDI: a foreign firm buys dollars to build a plant here, so D$ shifts right. Outward FDI: a Solvaran firm sells dollars to build abroad, so S$ shifts right. appreciates on inward FDI, depreciates on outward Inward or outward portfolio investment The same two directions, but shares and bonds rather than factories, so the money can turn round in a day: D$ right on inflows, S$ right on outflows. appreciates on inflows, depreciates on outflows Remittances Solvarans working abroad send money home: they sell euros and buy dollars, D$ right. Foreign workers here sending money home sell dollars, S$ right. appreciates on money sent in, depreciates on money sent out Speculation If traders expect the dollar to rise they buy it now: D$ right and S$ left at once. The expectation makes itself come true, for a while. moves the way the market expects it to move Relative inflation rates higher in Solvara Solvaran goods lose price competitiveness: exports fall, so D$ left, and imports look cheap, so S$ right. Both push the same way. depreciates Relative interest rates higher in Solvara Financial capital chases the higher return: foreigners buy dollars, D$ right, and Solvarans keep their money at home, S$ left. appreciates Relative growth rates Solvara growing faster Rising Solvaran incomes pull in imports, so S$ right. But fast growth also attracts investment, D$ right. The two pull against each other. ambiguous — say which effect you think is larger, and why Central bank intervention The bank buys dollars with its euro reserves, D$ right, to hold the rate up. Or it sells dollars for euros, S$ right, to hold it down. moves the way the bank wants, while the reserves last Learn the middle column. Naming the curve and the direction is where the analysis mark is.
Figure 5 · The ten causes the guide names, sorted

Four of them need a definition before they make sense.

Foreign direct investment, or FDI, is investment that buys a lasting interest in a productive asset abroad: a factory, a mine, a controlling stake in a firm. Portfolio investment is the purchase of shares and bonds without control. The difference matters here because FDI is slow and sticky, while portfolio money can arrive and leave inside a week, which is why portfolio flows move exchange rates more violently than FDI does.

A remittance is money sent home by somebody working in another country. For a country with many of its people working abroad, remittances are a large and steady source of demand for its currency.

Speculation is buying or selling a currency to profit from an expected change in its price, rather than to pay for anything. Speculation is the one cause that can make itself come true: if enough traders expect the dollar to rise and buy it now, demand rises and the dollar does rise. That works in reverse too, and it is why a currency can fall a long way in a day on no news about the real economy.

Three of the ten carry the word relative, and it is doing real work. Solvaran inflation of 6% tells you nothing on its own. Solvaran inflation of 6% when its trading partners are at 2% tells you Solvaran goods are losing price competitiveness, so exports fall and imports rise, and the dollar depreciates. The same goes for interest rates and growth rates: compare, then conclude.

Relative growth is the one to be careful with, because it pulls both ways. Faster growth in Solvara raises Solvaran incomes, and higher incomes buy more imports, which raises the supply of dollars and pushes the rate down. But faster growth also makes Solvara a better place to invest, which raises demand for dollars and pushes the rate up. There is no automatic answer. Say which effect you think is larger, and why, and you have earned an analysis mark that a student who picked one effect and ignored the other has not.

5Two calculations you will be asked for

Converting a price between two currencies. The quote €0.80 per $1 tells you what one dollar buys. A price already in dollars is multiplied by it; a price in euros is divided by it. Figure 6 does both, with the check that catches a wrong answer.

Figure 6 · Converting a price, in both directions Figure 6 · Converting a price, in both directions The quote: €0.80 per $1 the same rate as $1.25 per €1, because 1 ÷ 0.80 = 1.25 A Solvaran price into euros multiply by 0.80 A jacket priced at $50 in Solvara costs 50 × 0.80 = €40 in the euro area. A euro price into Solvaran dollars divide by 0.80 A machine priced at €600 in the euro area costs 600 ÷ 0.80 = $750 in Solvara. Check the answer before you write it down A dollar is worth less than a euro here. So a dollar price must come out as a smaller number of euros, and a euro price as a larger number of dollars. If yours did not, you used the wrong operation. One quote, two jobs. The arithmetic is easy; getting it the right way round is the exam.
Figure 6 · Converting a price, in both directions
  • A jacket priced at $50 in Solvara costs 50 × 0.80 = €40 in the euro area.
  • A machine priced at €600 in the euro area costs 600 ÷ 0.80 = $750 in Solvara.

Every exchange rate can be quoted both ways round, and the two quotes are reciprocals: 1 ÷ 0.80 = 1.25, so €0.80 per $1 is the same rate as $1.25 per €1. If you find dividing hard to keep straight, flip the quote first and multiply instead: €600 × 1.25 = $750, the same answer.

Calculating the change in the value of a currency. Use the ordinary percentage change formula on the rate itself:

percentage change = (new rate − old rate) ÷ old rate × 100

Suppose the dollar moves from €0.80 to €0.88. Then (0.88 − 0.80) ÷ 0.80 × 100 = +10%. The Solvaran dollar has appreciated by 10% against the euro.

Now the subtlety that catches nearly everyone. Look at the same event in the other quote. The euro was worth $1.25 and is now worth 1 ÷ 0.88 = $1.136. Its change is (1.136 − 1.25) ÷ 1.25 × 100 = −9.1%. A 10% appreciation of the dollar is a 9.1% depreciation of the euro, not a 10% one, because the two calculations divide by different starting numbers. State which currency you are measuring, and divide by that currency's old rate.

Feed the new rate back into the first calculation and you can see the consequences arriving before you have drawn anything. At €0.88, the $50 jacket now costs €44 abroad instead of €40, so Solvaran exports are dearer. The €600 machine now costs 600 ÷ 0.88 = $681.82 instead of $750, so imports into Solvara are cheaper. That is section 6 in two lines of arithmetic.

6What a change in the rate does to the economy

Take a depreciation of the Solvaran dollar. Exports are cheaper to foreigners, so export volumes rise. Imports are dearer at home, so import volumes fall. Net exports are a component of aggregate demand, so AD shifts right: output and employment rise, and so does the price level. That is the left panel of Figure 7.

Figure 7 · A depreciation on an AD/AS diagram Figure 7 · A depreciation on an AD/AS diagram The demand side Average price level (P) Real output (Y) SRAS AD₁ AD₂ P₁ Y₁ A P₂ Y₂ B exports cheaper, imports dearer: net exports rise, so AD rises The cost side Average price level (P) Real output (Y) AD SRAS₁ SRAS₂ P₁ Y₁ A P₂ Y₂ B imported fuel and parts cost more: firms' costs rise, so SRAS falls A depreciation pushes the price level up from both sides at once. What it does to real output depends on which of the two effects is the larger.
Figure 7 · A depreciation on an AD/AS diagram

The right panel is the half students forget. Solvaran firms buy fuel, components and machinery from abroad, and all of it now costs more in dollars. Their costs rise, so short-run aggregate supply shifts left: the price level rises again, and this time output falls. A depreciation therefore raises the price level through both channels and leaves the effect on output genuinely uncertain. An economy that imports most of its inputs can depreciate its way into higher prices and lower output at the same time.

An appreciation runs the whole argument backwards: net exports fall, AD shifts left, imported inputs get cheaper and SRAS shifts right, and the price level falls from both sides.

Figure 8 sets out what that means for each of the five indicators the guide names.

Figure 8 · The five indicators the guide asks about Figure 8 · The five indicators the guide asks about Indicator A depreciation tends to An appreciation tends to Inflation rate Raise it. Imported food, fuel and parts all cost more in dollars, which is imported cost-push inflation. Lower it. Imports are cheaper, and domestic firms face sharper competition on price. Economic growth Raise it, if the rise in net exports beats the rise in costs. AD shifts right, as in Figure 7. Lower it, as net exports fall. Firms that buy inputs abroad gain, so the net effect is smaller than it looks. Unemployment Lower it, in export industries and in firms competing with imports, because output rises with AD. Raise it, in the same industries. Some of the loss is offset in firms that import their raw materials. Current account balance Improve it, but only if demand for exports and imports is elastic enough. See the Marshall-Lerner condition, 4.6. Worsen it, under the same condition. In the short run volumes barely move, so the balance can go the other way. Living standards Cut the purchasing power of a Solvaran wage over imported goods, while raising jobs in exporting firms. Raise purchasing power over imported goods, while putting export jobs at risk. Who gains depends on the job. Always ask, before you commit to an answer How large is the change? How much of what Solvara buys and sells is traded internationally? How elastic is demand for exports and imports? How long has it been? Was the economy already near full employment? Every line here is a tendency, not a certainty. The panel underneath is where the marks are.
Figure 8 · The five indicators the guide asks about

Four of those five are straightforward analysis. The fourth, the current account, needs a warning. A depreciation makes exports cheaper and imports dearer in price, but the balance depends on what happens to volumes, and volumes take time to respond. If buyers barely change how much they buy, a country can end up paying more for the same imports and earning less for the same exports, and the current account gets worse before it gets better. The condition that decides this is the Marshall-Lerner condition, and it is taught with the J-curve in the HL sections of 4.6 Balance of payments. Name it here, then send the reader there; do not try to prove it in a 4.5 answer.

Living standards is the row that most rewards a careful answer, because a currency movement does not treat everybody in a country alike. A depreciation cuts what a Solvaran wage buys in imported goods, which is a real fall in living standards for anyone on a fixed income. The same depreciation raises output and jobs in Solvaran exporting firms, which is a real rise for the people who work in them. "Living standards fall" is half an answer. "Living standards fall for these people and rise for those, and here is which group is larger in Solvara" is a whole one.

7Fixed exchange rates, and how they are held

A fixed exchange rate is one that a government or central bank announces and then commits to holding, usually against another currency. The announced rate is the peg.

The market does not stop wanting to move. If demand and supply would clear below the peg, there is an excess supply of dollars at the peg: more dollars are being offered than anybody wants to buy. To stop the rate falling, the central bank buys its own currency, paying with the foreign currency reserves it holds. That is the left panel of Figure 9: the bank's purchases add to demand until D$ crosses S$ exactly on the peg, and the bank's reserves of euros fall.

Figure 9 · How a fixed exchange rate is maintained Figure 9 · How a fixed exchange rate is maintained Pressure down: the bank buys dollars Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded S$ D$₁ peg excess supply of $ D$₂ Pressure up: the bank sells dollars Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded D$ S$₁ peg excess demand for $ S$₂ The peg is the dashed line. The bank moves one curve until the market clears exactly on it. Left: it buys dollars with its euro reserves, which fall. Right: it sells dollars for euros, which rise.
Figure 9 · How a fixed exchange rate is maintained

If the market would clear above the peg, there is an excess demand for dollars. To stop the rate rising, the bank sells its own currency and takes euros in exchange, which shifts S$ right until the market clears on the peg. Its reserves rise. Notice which way round each case runs, because writing "the central bank buys dollars" when the diagram shows supply shifting is a contradiction a marker will spot immediately.

Buying and selling currency is the direct method, and it is the one the diagram shows. A government has two other levers the guide expects you to know about. It can raise interest rates, which attracts financial capital and raises demand for its currency, holding the rate up without spending reserves; that is the link back to monetary policy in 3.5, and the cost is that interest rates are no longer free to do anything about unemployment at home. And it can borrow foreign currency from abroad to top up the reserves it is spending.

The direct method has a hard limit in one direction. A bank defending a rate from above is selling reserves, and reserves run out. A bank defending from below is buying reserves and can in principle do that for ever. That asymmetry is why currencies collapse downwards and rarely upwards.

When holding the peg becomes too expensive, the government changes it, and this is where the vocabulary matters.

  • A devaluation is a deliberate reduction of the peg by the government: the currency is now officially worth less.
  • A revaluation is a deliberate increase of the peg: it is now officially worth more.

Both are decisions. Appreciation and depreciation are outcomes of a market. Using a floating word for a fixed system, or a fixed word for a floating one, is the cheapest mark in this subtopic to lose. Figure 10 is the grid to memorise.

Figure 10 · Four words, and the two systems they belong to Figure 10 · Four words, and the two systems they belong to Floating rate the market moves it Fixed rate the government announces it The currency rises in value The currency falls in value Appreciation demand rises or supply falls, and the rate settles higher Revaluation the government sets the peg at a higher rate than before Depreciation supply rises or demand falls, and the rate settles lower Devaluation the government sets the peg at a lower rate than before Using a floating word for a fixed system, or the other way round, is the quickest mark to lose.
Figure 10 · Four words, and the two systems they belong to

8Managed exchange rates, overvalued and undervalued

Most currencies are neither perfectly free nor firmly pegged. A managed exchange rate is one that is mostly set by the market, with the central bank intervening from time to time, often to keep the rate inside an announced band. Inside the band the rate floats; at a limit the bank steps in with exactly the operations in Figure 9. The left panel of Figure 11 shows the band.

Figure 11 · A managed rate, and the two ways to sit away from the market rate Figure 11 · A managed rate, and the two ways to sit away from the market rate A managed float inside a band Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded D$ S$ ceiling floor e* Q* free to float in here the bank steps in only at a limit Overvalued and undervalued Price of $1 in euros (€ per $) Quantity of Solvaran dollars traded D$ S$ e* excess supply excess demand held above e*: overvalued, reserves drain held below e*: undervalued, reserves pile up Left: the rate floats inside a band and the bank steps in only at an edge. Right: a rate held away from e* leaves a gap the central bank has to fill, day after day.
Figure 11 · A managed rate, and the two ways to sit away from the market rate

The right panel names the two ways a rate can sit away from where the market would put it.

  • A currency is overvalued when it is held above the rate the free market would set. At that rate there is an excess supply of the currency, so the central bank has to keep buying its own currency, and the reserves drain away. Imports are cheap, which holds inflation down and pleases consumers, but exports are expensive, which damages exporting firms and the jobs in them. It ends either in a devaluation or in a currency that runs out of reserves to defend.
  • A currency is undervalued when it is held below the rate the free market would set. At that rate there is an excess demand for the currency, so the bank keeps selling its own currency and piles up foreign reserves. Exports are cheap, which supports export industries and employment, but imports are dear, which raises the price of imported food, fuel and machinery and cuts what a wage buys. Trading partners may treat a persistently undervalued currency as unfair competition.

Neither is a mistake by definition. A government may hold a currency below the market rate on purpose to support its exporters. Say what the country is trying to achieve, then say who inside that country pays for it.

9HLFixed against floating

SL students can stop here. This section is an AO3 line: the guide asks you to evaluate the two systems, not to describe them, so an answer that lists features without weighing them is capped well below full marks.

Figure 12 · HL only · Fixed against floating, question by question Figure 12 · HL only · Fixed against floating, question by question The question Floating Fixed Who sets the rate? Supply and demand, minute by minute. Nobody has to defend anything. The government announces a rate and the central bank defends it. What corrects a current account deficit? The currency falls on its own and exports get cheaper: automatic. Nothing automatic. The peg must be defended, or devalued deliberately. How much foreign currency must be held? Little. The market clears itself at whatever rate it clears at. Large reserves, permanently. They can run out, and then the peg goes. Is monetary policy free? Yes. Interest rates can be set for inflation or unemployment at home. No. Interest rates are tied to holding the peg, whatever the need at home. How certain is life for traders and investors? Less. A contract signed today can be worth a different amount on delivery. More. A known rate makes pricing, planning and investing simpler. What disciplines inflation? Nothing external. A falling currency can feed inflation back into itself. The peg. Costs must stay in line with the anchor country or exports die. What can speculators do? Move the rate about, sometimes violently, but there is no target to hit. A peg that looks wrong is a one-way bet, and an attack can force a devaluation. Neither column is the right answer. Pick the questions that matter for the country in front of you.
Figure 12 · HL only · Fixed against floating, question by question

The honest summary is that each system buys one thing by giving up another.

A floating rate buys automatic adjustment and an independent monetary policy. A current account deficit means the country is supplying more of its currency than the world demands, so the currency falls on its own, exports get cheaper, and the deficit narrows without anybody deciding anything. Interest rates stay free to target inflation or unemployment at home. The price is uncertainty: a Solvaran exporter signing a contract today does not know what it will be worth on delivery, which discourages trade and investment, and a falling currency feeds inflation back into the economy through import prices.

A fixed rate buys certainty and discipline. Traders and investors know the rate, so contracts and plans are simpler. Costs at home have to stay in line with the anchor country or exports die, which is a discipline on inflation that a floating country does not have. The price is everything the floating country enjoyed: large reserves must be held permanently, monetary policy is tied up defending the peg, adjustment to a shock has to come out of wages and output instead of the exchange rate, and a peg that the market believes is wrong becomes a one-way bet that speculators can attack.

A judgement worth writing at the end of a part (b): the right system depends on the country. A small economy that trades heavily with one large partner, and that wants to import that partner's low inflation, gets more from a peg than a large diversified economy with its own credible central bank does. Name the country in the question, name which of the questions in Figure 12 matters most for it, and commit.

10Where marks are lost

Axes that describe goods instead of currency. "Price" and "Quantity" on their own, or worse, a quantity of exports across the bottom. The vertical axis is the price of one currency in another; the horizontal is the quantity of that same currency.

Muddling appreciation with revaluation. Market movements are appreciation and depreciation. Government decisions are revaluation and devaluation. Figure 10 is worth five minutes of memorising.

Shifting the wrong curve, or both. A cause acts on one side. Foreigners buying our exports is demand for our currency. Us buying imports is supply of our currency. Draw one shift per diagram and say which.

Treating the exchange rate as a cause of its own movement. "The dollar fell, so demand for dollars fell, so it fell further." The rate is the price on the vertical axis; it is what the curves produce, not a thing that shifts them. A change in the rate moves you along the curves.

Dividing when you should multiply. Check the direction of your answer against the rate. A dollar worth €0.80 is worth less than a euro, so a dollar price must come out as a smaller number of euros.

Assuming a 10% rise in one currency is a 10% fall in the other. It is not, because the two calculations start from different numbers. Work each one out separately.

Saying a depreciation always improves the current account. Only if demand for exports and imports responds enough, which is the Marshall-Lerner condition in 4.6. In the short run the balance can worsen first.

Calling a strong currency good and a weak one bad. Neither is true on its own. An appreciation helps importers and consumers of imported goods and hurts exporters; a depreciation does the reverse. Name who gains and who loses, and the marker can see you have understood it.

11Draw it right

Every exchange rate diagram you draw should carry all of these. Figure 1 is the model.

  1. A title or a caption naming the market: "the market for Solvaran dollars".
  2. The vertical axis labelled with the price of one currency in units of another, with the units: € per $.
  3. The horizontal axis labelled as a quantity of that currency over a period.
  4. Both curves labelled D$ and S$, not D and S, so it is clear the market is for the currency.
  5. A shifted curve labelled D$₂ or S$₂, the old one left in as D$₁ or S$₁, and an arrow showing the direction of the shift.
  6. Both equilibria marked with dotted lines to both axes: e₁ and e₂ on the price axis, Q₁ and Q₂ on the quantity axis.
  7. For a fixed or managed rate, the peg drawn as a horizontal line, labelled, with the excess demand or excess supply at that rate marked on the diagram.
  8. One change per diagram, and a sentence in your answer that refers to the figure by name.

12Try it

Marks in brackets. Answers and marker's notes are at the end. Do them before you look.

Q1. Define the term depreciation of a currency. 2 marks

Q2. The Solvaran dollar moves from €0.80 to €0.88. (a) Calculate the percentage change in the value of the Solvaran dollar against the euro. (b) Calculate the price in euros, before and after the change, of a Solvaran jacket priced at $50. 4 marks

Q3. Explain, using a diagram, how a rise in Solvaran interest rates relative to those of its trading partners would affect the exchange rate of the Solvaran dollar. 4 marks

Q4. Using an AD/AS diagram, explain two possible consequences for the Solvaran economy of a depreciation of the Solvaran dollar. 4 marks

Q5 (HL). Explain one advantage and one disadvantage of a fixed exchange rate system compared with a floating exchange rate system. 4 marks

13In one breath

An exchange rate is the price of one currency in terms of another, so draw it as a market with € per $ up the side and the quantity of dollars along the bottom. Demand for a currency comes from anyone who must pay that country; supply comes from anyone who must pay abroad. A rise in demand or a fall in supply gives an appreciation; a fall in demand or a rise in supply gives a depreciation. Ten things move those curves: export demand, import demand, FDI, portfolio investment, remittances, speculation, and relative inflation, interest and growth rates, plus the central bank itself. Multiply a dollar price by the rate to get euros, divide a euro price by it to get dollars, and never assume a 10% rise one way is a 10% fall the other. A depreciation raises the price level from both sides of AD/AS and improves the current account only if volumes respond. Under a fixed rate the bank buys its own currency to hold the rate up and sells it to hold the rate down, and only a government devalues or revalues. A managed rate floats inside a band; held above the market rate a currency is overvalued and the reserves drain, held below it is undervalued and they pile up. HL: floating buys adjustment and policy freedom, fixed buys certainty and discipline, and which is worth more depends on the country.


Answers

Q1. A depreciation is a fall in the value of one currency in terms of another, brought about by market forces under a floating exchange rate. 1 for "a fall in the value of a currency in terms of another currency", 1 for the market or floating-rate context. Saying the government lowered it describes devaluation and scores 1 at most.

Q2. (a) (0.88 − 0.80) ÷ 0.80 × 100 = +10%. The Solvaran dollar has appreciated by 10% against the euro. (b) Before: 50 × 0.80 = €40. After: 50 × 0.88 = €44. 1 for the correct percentage working, 1 for stating it as an appreciation of 10%, 1 for €40, 1 for €44. An answer that divides by 0.88 anywhere scores 0 for that part; working shown with a wrong final figure still earns the method mark.

Q3. Higher Solvaran interest rates relative to those abroad raise the return on holding Solvaran financial assets. Foreign investors must obtain Solvaran dollars to buy those assets, so the demand for dollars increases and D$ shifts right from D$₁ to D$₂; Solvarans also have less reason to move money abroad, so the supply of dollars falls. On the diagram the exchange rate rises from e₁ to e₂ and the quantity traded rises from Q₁ to Q₂: the Solvaran dollar appreciates. 1 for a correctly labelled diagram with € per $ on the vertical axis and quantity of dollars on the horizontal, 1 for showing the demand curve shifting right with both equilibria marked, 1 for the mechanism linking relative interest rates to capital inflows, 1 for stating the appreciation. An unlabelled or mislabelled pair of axes loses the diagram mark whatever the text says.

Q4. A depreciation makes Solvaran exports cheaper abroad and imports dearer at home, so net exports rise and aggregate demand shifts right from AD₁ to AD₂: real output rises from Y₁ to Y₂ and unemployment falls, but the average price level rises from P₁ to P₂, which is demand-pull inflation. At the same time Solvaran firms pay more in dollars for imported fuel and components, so their costs rise and short-run aggregate supply shifts left, raising the price level again and this time reducing output. The overall effect on output depends on which of the two effects is larger, which in turn depends on how much of what Solvara produces relies on imported inputs. 1 for a correctly labelled AD/AS diagram showing at least one shift with both equilibria marked, 1 for the net exports and AD chain, 1 for the imported cost and SRAS chain, 1 for a consequence named in the guide's terms, such as inflation, growth or unemployment. A list of consequences with no diagram is capped at 2.

Q5 (HL). One advantage of a fixed rate is certainty: exporters, importers and investors know what a contract will be worth when it is settled, which lowers the risk of trading and investing across borders and so encourages both. One disadvantage is the loss of an independent monetary policy: interest rates have to be set at whatever level holds the peg, so they are not available to cut unemployment in a recession or to bring inflation down, and the adjustment has to come out of wages and output instead. 1 for a valid advantage, 1 for explaining why it follows from the rate being fixed, 1 for a valid disadvantage, 1 for explaining it. Two advantages, or two disadvantages, is capped at 2. Naming without explaining earns the first mark of each pair only.


Educerie · written from the published IB Diploma Programme Economics guide, first assessment 2022, section 4.5 Exchange rates. Original text, examples and questions. Diagrams drawn by Educerie. Last reviewed 11 September 2026.

Mocks: in the future, hold tight!